[CrackMonkey] Uh...

[Chris J. DiBona]

I'd be surprised if Reiser made it in to 2.4 from what I've heard, both it
and ext3 are at about the same level of reliability, specifically
unreliability when used with software raid and when presented with bad
blocks.

 Chris


--
Linux Community Evangelist, VA Linux Systems            http://www.valinux.com
President, Silicon Valley Linux Users Group               http://www.svlug.org
Grant Chair, Linux International.                            http://www.li.org
Co-editor, Open Sources	                                 http://www.dibona.com

On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Monkey Master wrote:

> begin  Mike Goldman quotation:
> > Well, ext3 won't be in 2.4 most likely.  ReiserFS will probably be,
> > including journaling. Since this is a whole lot different from
> > traditional fs design in ways much more significant than the
> > addition of journaling, it would be hard to isolate just that aspect
> > for comparison.
> 
> 	See, you can compile softupdates into your kernel and use it
> on an EXISTING ext2 partition (if someone would just write the damn
> thing).  You wouldn't need to reformat your partitions.
> 
> -- 
> CrackMonkey.Org - Non-sequitur arguments and ad-hominem personal attacks
> LinuxCabal.Org  - Co-location facilities and meeting space 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CrackMonkey: Non-sequitur arguments and ad-hominem personal attacks
> http://crackmonkey.org/mailman/listinfo/crackmonkey
>