[free-sklyarov] _Alice_ read aloud

[ca2027001 at sneakemail.com]

>My work on recapturing Carroll's exact typography and 
>design was probably more exhaustive than his original 
>work. It's copyrighted for that reason

This begs the question that if he "recaptured" the
"original" typography -- isn't it the "original
typography" and "exact design" that's a hundred years  
old and in the public domain?!?! How can it be 
"more exhaustive" if it's an "exact" copy of 
the original?!?


Phillip K.