[free-sklyarov] List of Demands
Len Sassaman
rabbi at quickie.net
Thu Jul 19 23:23:46 PDT 2001
I do not have the time at present to address this email. Once I'm able to
focus on other things, I certainly will come back to it.
Thanks,
Len
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Jeme A Brelin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Len Sassaman wrote:
> > Find someone else to be your test case. An American. You, perhaps.
>
> I'm working on it.
>
> > > Maybe you're just trusting Felten v. RIAA.
> > Maybe we want to see this 26 year old father of two returned to his family
> > in his home country.
>
> Maybe we should wait and ask him which is more important to him: the
> personal freedom of millions of other human beings or his ability to spend
> more time with his kids. I know which one I'd choose.
>
> > > > 5) Adobe pledge its support for open and fair peer review of all Adobe
> > > > copy protection schemes, particularly encrypted PDF and eBook.
> > > Do you really want to see these schemes IMPROVED? Do you really want to
> > > make it so that they have both legal AND technical ability to prevent you
> > > from exercising your rights?
> >
> > Irrelevant to the topic of this list, but yes.
>
> It was made relevant by stating it as one of "our demands".
>
> > If they are going to sell a product, it should do what they are
> > claiming. Copyright holders are trusting Adobe to provide security for
> > their eBooks, and Adobe is failing to do so.
>
> It DOES do what it's claiming. It has an access control that, by the
> standards of the DMCA, "effectively controls access". Circumventing that
> control is illegal, so it doesn't matter what kind of job it does under
> objective scrutiny.
>
> > If you don't like how eBooks function, don't buy them.
>
> And just "deal with it" when it become the dominant form of media? I
> don't think so.
>
> If I'm going to be granting a person monopoly rights, I'm going to do it
> for a good reason like public benefit.
>
> > > > 6) Adobe pledge to work with the scientific and technical communities
> > > > to amend the eBook architecture to preserve fair use rights for end
> > > > users.
> > > It is simply NOT POSSIBLE to allow fair use and implement access controls.
> > This is irrelevant to the topic of this list -- freeing Dmitry.
>
> The list is CALLED "free-dmitry", but we don't simply want him free. We
> want it to be impossible to legally jail someone on this pretext ever
> again.
>
> > But I will make the one comment that *no one* should be arguing that
> > access controls be made illegal. Only that analysis of and attempts to
> > defeat access controls should not be illegal.
>
> I'm arguing it and I'm sure you'd agree that I have every right to do so.
>
> > A copyright holder has the right to make whatever contract he wants
> > when he licenses you his software. You just built a strawman argument
> > that our enemies can knock down. I suggest you take this to a
> > different, more appropriate list.
>
> First, what makes them a copyright holder? Copyright is something granted
> to them by the public in return for public benefit. If the work isn't
> public, it shouldn't be copyrighted.
>
> Second, a license is not sale. This is the bullshit we've been fed in the
> last decade or two. They've convinced us that they don't SELL a copy of
> their work to us anymore, they merely license it. The license exists to
> impose arbitrary conditions on the public; conditions that are NOT part of
> the agreement that gave them copyright on the first place. Licensing a
> work is inherently NOT publication.
>
> I would argue that a person distributing information can either use legal
> protection measures (a la copyright law) OR technological protection
> measures (a la CSS), but not both. Using both allows the distributor to
> get the benefit of a publicly sanctioned and subsidized monopoly without
> necessarily benefiting the public in any way.
>
> Third, this list is exactly the forum for these issues. The arrest of
> Dmitry Sklyarov is one symptom in the increasing disease of our
> society. The primary indications of this disease are: destruction of the
> public sphere, corporate control of government, and lack of national
> humility. We need to use this atrocity to raise awareness of these
> issues. Simply freeing Dmitry will leave us no further away from the
> situation we were in on Saturday, before Dmitry's arrest.
>
> J.
> --
> -----------------
> Jeme A Brelin
> jeme at brelin.net
> -----------------
> [cc] counter-copyright
> http://www.openlaw.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> free-sklyarov mailing list
> free-sklyarov at zork.net
> http://zork.net/mailman/listinfo/free-sklyarov
>
--
Len Sassaman
Security Architect |
Technology Consultant | "Let be be finale of seem."
|
http://sion.quickie.net | --Wallace Stevens
More information about the Free-sklyarov
mailing list