[free-sklyarov] What did he do IN THE US that was 'wrong'?

Mickey McGown mickeym at mindspring.com
Thu Jul 26 20:34:43 PDT 2001


Granted, but the commercial gain was stretched to mean financial gain, which was
then applied as avoiding payment for a copyrighted work. It didn't sway the judge
one bit that the software was a free download..

Branden Robinson wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:51:26PM -0400, Mickey McGown wrote:
> > 2600 wasn't selling DeCSS, either
>
> 2600 wasn't criminally prosecuted, but sued by plaintiffs in civil court.
>
> --
> G. Branden Robinson                |  The only way to get rid of a temptation
> Debian GNU/Linux                   |  is to yield to it.
> branden at deadbeast.net              |  -- Oscar Wilde
> http://www.deadbeast.net/~branden/ |
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature





More information about the Free-sklyarov mailing list