[CrackMonkey] [firstname.lastname@example.org: CrackMonkey Subscribe Notification]
joakim at helixcode.com
Mon Jul 31 16:52:23 PDT 2000
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 11:35:12PM -0700, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Monday, 31 July 2000, at 21:51:31 (+0100),
> Paul J Collins wrote:
>> Dumbest idea I've ever seen. Why use a structure like a database,
>> which provides much un-needed overlay, when in fact such a thing
>> could be acomplished in a text file -- that would require less code,
>> less libraries to link with (gdbm I believe is what EFM asks for)
>> and it would be human readable.
> This is also not true. Databases were chosen for one simple reason:
> speed of random access to data. No text file can come close to the
> speed of a binary database.
So using in-memory models that actually differ from the flat text file format
never occured to you. That gives me a lot of faith in your system. I'd also
like to know what the speed advantages are of using a binary database to hold
lots of images in a monolithic file are, as compared to having the images in
separate files with known filenames.
Joakim Ziegler - Helix Code web monkey - joakim at helixcode.com - Radagast at IRC
FIX sysop - free software coder - FIDEL & Conglomerate developer
http://www.avmaria.com/ - http://www.helixcode.com/
More information about the Crackmonkey