[free-sklyarov] Language: copy prevention
David Haworth
david.haworth at altavista.net
Sun Aug 5 22:51:48 PDT 2001
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 04:32:28PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I'm suggesting that the term used to describe anti-circumvention works
> under the DMCA be "copy prevention". This describes what they do, they
> provide (or attempt) a technical block on copying data.
>
> Other terms include
>
> - "digital rights management" (DRM): too vague and antisceptic.
> - "content protection": used by fair use opponents, sounds vague
> helpful. "Gee, I'm being protected from something".
> - "copy protection": coined by John Gilmore. More accurate, but
> still a bit of warm fuzz.
>
> "Copy prevention" states what these technolgies and laws are aimed at.
> That's my suggestion.
>
> Comments?
I'm against this term simply because that's what the manufacturers want
you to think. But none of these so-called protections actually prevent
copying - they're all access-control technologies.
--
David Haworth
Baiersdorf, Germany
david.haworth at altavista.net
More information about the Free-sklyarov
mailing list