[free-sklyarov] Real eBook piracy vs. imagined piracy
Jon O .
jono at microshaft.org
Tue Aug 7 13:00:10 PDT 2001
This is very interesting. It seems their self-destruct feature
could be used to destory evidence of their own priacy and is
therefore also a circumvention device ;)...
Do you think we have a case?
On 07-Aug-2001, Richard M. Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Speaking of RosettaBooks, they are being sued by Random House for
> publishing eBooks that Random House claims RosettaBooks does not have
> the rights to. If the courts agree with Random House, the book industry
> will have its first real case of eBook piracy. On the other hand, if
> RosettaBooks wins, the rest of book publishing industry is going to be
> in a real pickle. They will be forced to go back to authors to acquire
> eBook rights. In addition, the publishers might be violating copyrights
> on existing eBooks if the publisher didn't first get the proper rights
> from authors.
>
> The lawsuit seems to turn on the simple question: Does the definition of
> a book encompass eBooks? For some reason, the publishing industry seems
> to be very quiet about this lawsuit in stark contrast to the AAP's press
> release cheering on the DOJ for arresting Dmitry.
>
More information about the Free-sklyarov
mailing list