[free-sklyarov] RE: FJIA etc
Will Janoschka
wiljan at pobox.com
Tue Nov 6 07:32:37 PST 2001
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 22:32:24 Lung, Mon Yin mylung at ku.edu wrote:
> First of all, my apology for posting this message so late. I am a law
> student who has chosen DMCA and Mr. Sklyarov's case as my research topic,
> hence my being on this list.
> I can't suppress my urge to comment on FIJA: I skipped through their
> website, and noticed that this organization is promoting something that is
> no longer within the current legal practice. I don't want to comment on the
> merit of their idea and opinion. I only want to point out that what they
> promote is not what generally accepted by the U.S. Court system. Under the
> current system, a jury is the finder of fact, but only a judge can decide on
> the matter of law. Whether Mr. Sklyarov violate DMCA is a matter of fact,
> whether DMCA is unconstitutional is a matter of law. ...........
Uh! I believe they are both a matter of fact as there is no case law on the
criminal portions of the DMCA. A jury, by reason of the need for agreement,
is far more qualified than a trial judge to determine if an untested "law"
is illegal for whatever reason. Please show the circumstances under which a
jury's unanimous decision to acquit, in a criminal trial, may be challenged.
-will-
"Erwin," said Frau Schroedinger, "What did you do to the cat; it looks half dead."
More information about the Free-sklyarov
mailing list