[free-sklyarov] [dave@farber.net: IP: Canadian "DMCA" in the Works - Short Deadline]
Seth David Schoen
schoen at loyalty.org
Sat Sep 8 10:26:58 PDT 2001
I've seen this before, but it's a good letter-writing target for those
in Canada.
----- Forwarded message from David Farber <dave at farber.net> -----
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 03:33:32 -0400
To: ip-sub-1 at majordomo.pobox.com
From: David Farber <dave at farber.net>
Subject: IP: Canadian "DMCA" in the Works - Short Deadline
>ALERT: Canadian "DMCA" in the Works - Short Deadline
>
> Tell Canada to Reject Anti-Technology Bans
>
> Electronic Frontier Foundation ACTION ALERT
>
> (Issued: Friday, September 7, 2001 / Deadline: Saturday, September 15,
> 2001)
>
> Introduction:
>
> Canadian citizens, and others, are urged to contact the Canadian
> government and express their opposition to legislation, similar to the
> Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the U.S., that would outlaw
> circumvention of technological restrictions put in place by copyright
> holders. The Canadian government is accepting public comment until
> September 15, 2001 on its proposed "Consultation Paper on Digital
> Copyright Issues" which considers such measures.
>
> These anti-technology bans violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and
> Freedom's guarantee of freedom of speech, and similar guarantees in
> the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, since such tools are
> necessary to exercise lawful uses, including fair use. They would turn
> scientists, fair users, journalists, programmers, and archivists into
> criminals. While protecting copyright is important, passing measures
> that also censor much lawful speech goes too far, without ever
> achieving its objective.
>
> Canada is considering adopting anti-circumvention legislation in
> response to the World Intellectual Property Organization's (WIPO) 1996
> Copyright Treaty. This treaty, however, does not require enacting
> national legislation that outlaws technology with many lawful uses.
> Given the dismal US experience with the DMCA, other countries should
> learn from and steer clear of the U.S. Congress's mistake.
>
> What YOU Can Do:
>
> EFF calls upon the citizens of Canada, and other interested parties
> around the world, to submit comments by Sept. 15, urging the Canadian
> agency Intellectual Property Policy Directorate to remove the
> provisions of the Consultation Paper on Digital Copyright Issues that
> outlaw the act of circumvention and forbid providing tools for
> circumvention of technological protection measures restricting use of
> copyrighted works.
>
> Comments, to be received by the government by September 15, 2001,
> should be submitted to:
>
> Comments - Government of Canada Copyright Reform
> c/o Intellectual Property Policy Directorate
> Industry Canada
> 235 Queen Street
> 5th Floor West
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H5 Canada
> fax: (613) 941-8151
> copyright-droitdauteur at ic.gc.ca (text, HTML, WordPerfect and MSWord
> formats accepted)
>
> Sample Letter:
>
> This is just an example. It will be most effective if you send
> something similar but in your own words.
>
> To Industry Canada, the Department of Canadian Heritage, the
> Intellectual Property Policy Directorate and other concerned
> agencies:
>
> I write to express my grave concern regarding the extreme
> intellectual property provisions of the Consultation Paper on
> Digital Copyright Issues (CPCDI).
>
> These measures, based on the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act
> (DMCA), give far too much power to publishers, at the expense of
> indivdiuals' rights. The DMCA itself is already under legal
> challenge in the US, has gravely chilled scientists' and computer
> security researchers' freedom of expression around the world for
> fear of being prosecuted in the US, and resulted in the arrest of a
> Russian programmer. The CPDCI provisions, which serve no one but
> (largely American) corporate copyright interests, are just as
> overbroad as those of the DMCA.
>
> These provisions would amend the Canadian Copyright Act to ban,
> with few or no exceptions, software and other tools that allow copy
> prevention technologies to be bypassed. This would violate the
> Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantee of freedom of speech, and
> similar guarantees in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
> since such tools are necessary to exercise lawful uses, including
> fair use, reverse engineering, computer security research and many
> others.
>
> I urge you to remove these controversial and anti-freedom
> provisions from the CPDCI language. The DMCA is already an
> international debacle. Its flaws should not be imported and forced
> on Canadians.
>
> Sincerely,
> [Your full name]
> [Your address]
>
> Background:
>
> For more information about the Canadian Copyright Act amendment
> process, including the proposed digital copyright measures and how
> Canadian citizens can become involved, see the following Web site:
> http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/rp01100e.html
>
> About EFF:
>
> The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading civil liberties
> organization working to protect rights in the digital world. Founded
> in 1990, EFF actively encourages and challenges industry and
> government to support free expression, privacy, and openness in the
> information society. EFF is a member-supported organization and
> maintains one of the most linked-to Web sites in the world:
> http://www.eff.org
>
> Contact:
>
> Will Doherty, EFF Online Activist / Media Relations
> wild at eff.org
> +1 415 436 9333 x111
>
> Robin Gross, EFF Intellectual Property Attorney
> robin at eff.org
> +1 415 436 9333 x112
>
> - end -
For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Seth David Schoen <schoen at loyalty.org> | Its really terrible when FBI arrested
Temp. http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/ | hacker, who visited USA with peacefull
down: http://www.loyalty.org/ (CAF) | mission -- to share his knowledge with
http://www.freesklyarov.org/ | american nation. (Ilya V. Vasilyev)
More information about the Free-sklyarov
mailing list