[free-sklyarov] Libertarian party is not our friends, they are no better then the democrats and republicans.
Charles Eakins
admin at seattle-chat.com
Wed Sep 12 10:00:18 PDT 2001
Frothing? Hardly, I made a statement, all of which was true, instead of
being constructive, your being destructive. But what is your point? I had
already done what you suggested, because that was the obvious course of
action, so that's why I fired off my e-mail in frustration. What do you
expect, to keep focusing my efforts on knocking on a door, that's obviously
at this point, not going to open?
-----Original Message-----
From: free-sklyarov-admin at zork.net
[mailto:free-sklyarov-admin at zork.net]On Behalf Of Declan McCullagh
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:32 AM
To: Charles Eakins
Cc: free-sklyarov at zork.net; dmca_discuss at lists.microshaft.org;
it_union at lists.microshaft.org
Subject: RE: [free-sklyarov] Libertarian party is not our friends, they
are no better then the democrats and republicans.
If you'd stop frothing -- I know, an unlikely proposition -- you'd see that
I was talking about the message you sent today to the free-sklyarov list
(and others). Yawn.
At 09:27 AM 9/12/01 -0700, Charles Eakins wrote:
>Hello McFly been tried! I forwarded many articles to them over the past 2
>months. Any "sniping" I did was deserved, you weren't on the list, so your
>not very well informed now are you? Now who's sniping?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Declan McCullagh [mailto:declan at well.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:15 AM
>To: Charles Eakins; Charles Eakins
>Cc: free-sklyarov at zork.net; dmca_discuss at lists.microshaft.org;
>it_union at lists.microshaft.org
>Subject: RE: [free-sklyarov] Libertarian party is not our friends, they
>are no better then the democrats and republicans.
>
>
>Maybe, but at least one (large) party chapter came out in favor of
Sklyarov:
>http://www.politechbot.com/p-02377.html
>
>Like any organization, political parties have limited resources and lots of
>things to deal with. If you show them the SF LP statement and statements
>from libertarian groups opposing Sklyarov's arrest and work with them over
>time (instead of sniping at them on a mailing list), perhaps you'll win
>them over.
>
>I wonder what the Democratic and Republican parties think of the DMCA? Oh,
>that's right. They wrote it and unanimously approved it. :)
>
>-Declan
>
>
>At 09:11 AM 9/12/01 -0700, Charles Eakins wrote:
> >For me, the Seattle branch of the Libertarian party has sat on there
butts
> >about this, and basically voiced that this is not an issue they want to
>deal
> >with right now.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: declan at cluebot.com [mailto:declan at cluebot.com]On Behalf Of Declan
> >McCullagh
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:16 AM
> >To: Charles Eakins
> >Cc: free-sklyarov at zork.net; dmca_discuss at lists.microshaft.org;
> >it_union at lists.microshaft.org
> >Subject: Re: [free-sklyarov] Libertarian party is not our friends, they
> >are no better then the democrats and republicans.
> >
> >
> >There are loons in the Libertarian Party, true, but there are loons in
> >every party. I've spent some time in the last few years writing about the
> >Libertarians and the Greens, and I suspect they're the only (sizeable)
> >political parties that would ever come out against the DMCA and SSSCA.
> >
> >-Declan
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 06:29:34AM -0700, Charles Eakins wrote:
> > > After spending the last two months on an a local "official"
libertarian
> > > party mailing list, I've come to the conclusion that the Libertarian
>party
> > > are a bunch of idiots. They had no interest in DMCA issues, and Harry
> > > Browne they're pick for president has just put the nail in the coffin
of
> >my
> > > beliefs. First off we don't know who actually committed this "act of
>war"
> > > on the united states, until we know this for fact, I think Mr. Browns
> > > article was embarrassing, and just plain moronic. What Mr. Browne is
> > > basically saying is we deserved to have innocent Men, Women, and
>Children
> > > killed, even though again we don't know for sure who committed this
> >atrocity
> > > for a fact. We can conjecture, but until we know for a fact this
>article
> > > wasn't constructive. I saw allot of in fighting on the libertarian
>list,
> > > and I was caution us to distance ourselves from them.
> > >
> > > Article I'm talking about:
> > >
> > > http://www.antiwar.com/orig/browne2.html
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > free-sklyarov mailing list
> > > free-sklyarov at zork.net
> > > http://zork.net/mailman/listinfo/free-sklyarov
_______________________________________________
free-sklyarov mailing list
free-sklyarov at zork.net
http://zork.net/mailman/listinfo/free-sklyarov
More information about the Free-sklyarov
mailing list