[free-sklyarov] Why don't the subscribers of this mailing list use gpg og pgp?

[Micheas Herman]

On Thu, 2001-09-13 at 08:39, Chuck Mead wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 13 Sep 2001, Micheas Herman posted the following:
> 
> MH>I find it ironic that on a mailing list devoted to freeing someone who
> MH>is faceing many years in prison for cracking ROT-13 encryption, only one
> MH>member of the mailing list consistantly signs his mail. 
> 
> I think there is more than one... just many people don't have as much to 
> say as some of the other people do. 
> 
> - -- 
> csm
> Free Dmitry!
> Boycott Adobe!
> Repeal the DMCA!
> Stop the SSSCA!
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAjug0ykACgkQv6Gjsf2pQ0q9iwCfdwkG3QjnYZXnxEdzxpVEEXvx
> 49AAoJ3ohSHzZm6/aBwKKxsrRatpAxOS
> =awTj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> free-sklyarov mailing list
> free-sklyarov at zork.net
> http://zork.net/mailman/listinfo/free-sklyarov

OK, I'm sorry, I was over stating my case a little.  But people look at
your actions more than your words and if almost all the posts here were
signed I bet we would increace the use of encryption and digital
signatures..  .