[free-sklyarov] U.S. v. Elcomsoft: Prosecution rests

[Jay Sulzberger]

On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Seth David Schoen wrote:

> Jay Sulzberger writes:
>
> > Folk of the List!
> >
> > There is still one day to get comments in.  The Broadcast Flag Mandate is
> > the most instant threat to free software and the right of private ownership
> > of computers.
> >
> > http://www.lxny.org/announce/2002/FCC.6.December.2002.html
>
> Thanks, Jay.
>
> We also have some material on this at
>
> http://bpdg.blogs.eff.org/archives/000234.html#000234
>
> I would encourage people who are not familiar with the issue to base
> their comments on an existing sample letter (there are now several) or
> to become familiar by reading several sources.  Some fraction of the
> individual comments are making irrelevant or incorrect statements, and
> that will undermine the credibility of individual commenters.  (If a
> lot of people say something which is a misconception, MPAA can say in
> its reply comments that all these consumers have been misled and
> actually have nothing to worry about.)
>
> I have a minor correction to the LXNY article.  The filing deadline is
> 7:00p for paper-filed comments and midnight for electronic comments
> via ECFS.  You can confirm this at
>
> http://wireless.fcc.gov/csinfo/comments.html
>
> --
> Seth David Schoen <schoen at loyalty.org> | Reading is a right, not a feature!
>      http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/   |                 -- Kathryn Myronuk
>      http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/     |

Thanks, Seth, and thanks, and thanks again for your work and the work of
the EFF!

oo--JS.