I still might filter posts by content (Was: Bad FROM
address {{was Re: [svfig-open] Low max...)
Kevin Appert
forther at attbi.com
Tue May 20 16:24:01 PDT 2003
I agree that filtering by content is appropriate. If you have time by all
means have at it! My comments about FROM were an addenda, an appendix as
it were, not a duodenum* in your metaphoric lower GI.
I thought the Ivory Coast lady hoot was being truly!
By the way, in the words of Yoda: "Learn Forth quickly will I"
* [Middle English, from Medieval Latin, short for intestnum duodnum
digitrum, intestine of twelve finger-widths (in length), from
Latin duodnum, genitive pl. of duodn, twelve each, from duodecim,
twelve. See duodecimal.]
At 01:57 PM 05/20/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>You must be 20KB thin to ride svfig-open. I had listed some too-fat posts
>that never made this list (and had posted similarly to svfig). Even so:
>
>On Tue, 20 May 2003, Kevin Appert wrote:
> > Don't assume it's from who it says it is.
> > I've been getting a couple of viruses and other junk from assorted
> > addresses including sysop at amresearch. My point is that it almost
> > certainly is NOT coming from Al.
>
>... Kevin's advice to the effect that we'd do well to examine posts'
>Actual Headers, rather than their Sheep's Clothing... pertains.
>
>So thanks, Kevin. Even so, in my original essay I only feign'd innocence.
>
>[... original essay available online...]
>
>As it happened, moments later, Mrs. Spanish Prisoner wrote...
>
>... provoking me to suggest that (absent opposition) I might essay some
>content-filtering on svfig-open. -g
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>svfig-open mailing list
>svfig-open at zork.net
>http://zork.net/mailman/listinfo/svfig-open
More information about the svfig-open
mailing list