[free-sklyarov] Why is Sklyarov still in jail?

[Charles Eakins]

I really don't understand this, since if you were arrested locally, they
have 72 hours.  Why do the feds have no restrictions?  Maybe this is
something else that needs to be gone after.

-----Original Message-----
From: free-sklyarov-admin at zork.net
[mailto:free-sklyarov-admin at zork.net]On Behalf Of Peter
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 4:53 AM
To: Ed Carp; free-sklyarov at zork.net
Subject: RE: [free-sklyarov] Why is Sklyarov still in jail?


2 weeks without bail is not very long. Kevin Mitnik was sitting in
jail 4 1/2 years without bail or trail.
Peter


Free Dmitry Sklyarov
Repeal the DMCA
----------------------------------------
http://www.lupercalia.net/dmca
http://www.freesklyarov.org


Seth David Schoen (schoen at loyalty.org) writes:

> > Why doesn't
> > someone file a writ of habeas corpus in Federal court to get this
man out of
> > jail?
>
> "Too early" -- an experienced lawyer.

Really?  How's that?

> Nobody feels that the government has violated legal standards for a
> speedy and public trial yet.  Committed a monstrous injustice, yes.
> Made the U.S. look ridiculous and frightening to the rest of the
> world, sure.  Violated legal standards for procedural due process in
> criminal cases, no.

You're kidding, right?  You're telling me that it's *normal* for a
Federal
prisoner to be held *weeks* without a bail hearing?  Hs he even been
arraigned
yet?

If I were arrested tomorrow, if I hadn't been arraigned and bail set
by 9 AM
Monday morning, rest assured that my attorney would be in court by
noon.  Why
is it OK for the Federal courts to violate the Sixth and Eighth
Amendments?

> > Why is he being denied bail?
>
> The bail hearing hasn't happened yet.
>
> Sklyarov is being treated, say attorneys, no worse than your typical
> Federal prisoner.

Then this country is in serious trouble when a prisoner can be held
for weeks
without a bail hearing.  If memory serves, even the Supreme Court has
ruled
on cases regarding how long one can be held without a hearing, and
under what
circumstances one can be held without bail.  This is an absolute
crock.

On the other hand, if it can be shown that the Government delay is
excessive,
the charges against Sklyarov can be dismissed (Strunk v. US) - maybe
that's
what this whole thing is about...

The FBI agents (who are named in the affidavit, by the way) should be
brought
up on criminal charges - 18 USC 1983 comes to mind... they *knew*, or
should
have known, that Sklyarov had committed no crime while in this
country, and
they have a duty to the law to see that the law is upheld.  "Fidelity,
Bravery,
and Integrity", indeed.
--
Ed Carp, N7EKG  	erc at pobox.com		214/986-5870 cell phone
http://www.pobox.com/~erc

I sometimes wonder if the American people deserve to be free - they
seem
so unwilling to fight to preserve the few freedoms they have left.

_______________________________________________
free-sklyarov mailing list
free-sklyarov at zork.net
http://zork.net/mailman/listinfo/free-sklyarov


_______________________________________________
free-sklyarov mailing list
free-sklyarov at zork.net
http://zork.net/mailman/listinfo/free-sklyarov