[free-sklyarov] _Alice_ read aloud

ca2027001 at sneakemail.com ca2027001 at sneakemail.com
Fri Aug 24 18:57:41 PDT 2001

>My work on recapturing Carroll's exact typography and 
>design was probably more exhaustive than his original 
>work. It's copyrighted for that reason

This begs the question that if he "recaptured" the
"original" typography -- isn't it the "original
typography" and "exact design" that's a hundred years  
old and in the public domain?!?! How can it be 
"more exhaustive" if it's an "exact" copy of 
the original?!?

Phillip K.

More information about the Free-sklyarov mailing list