[Seth-Trips] Gilmore v. Gonzales appellate argument, December 8

[Seth David Schoen]

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/calendar.nsf/818e02a1deab7b7b882567770063a742/7847252e57564d15882570a700735e2f?OpenDocument

Thursday, December 8, 2005 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor

( ) * 04-10249 United States v. Napier
( ) * 04-15503 Burnett v. Resurgent Capital
( ) * 04-15552 Braddock v. Clark County
( ) 04-15736 Gilmore v. Gonzales
( ) 04-15823 Hoff v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance
( ) 04-15950 Maninger v. Hartford Insurance Co.

This is the Ninth Circuit appellate argument in John Gilmore's case
challenging the requirement to show ID in order to fly (formerly
captioned Gilmore v. Ashcroft).  This will be at the Ninth Circuit
headquarters at 95 Seventh Street in San Francisco.

-- 
Seth David Schoen <schoen at loyalty.org> | This is a new focus for the security
     http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/   | community. The actual user of the PC
     http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/     | [...] is the enemy.
                                       |          -- David Aucsmith, IDF 1999