Political Art by Paul Von Blum
HistoryMotorists and pedestrians in Venice, California throughout the mid-1980s have been startled to see political messages in places they scarcely expected. Accustomed to thousands of commercial billboards in southern California, a natural adjunct to the region's automobile culture, they are deeply familiar with advertisements for tobacco, wine coolers, soft drinks, motor vehicles, movies, TV shows, and other expressions of the consumption-equals-good-life ideology of modern capitalism. The billboard is a central medium of popular culture, a visual form of far greater impact than any art museum or gallery.But instead of a manipulative pitch for Winston cigarettes, drivers have been confronted with a warning about American support of contra terrorism in Nicaragua. In place of the slick appeal of modern newscasters, the commuter has been asked to consider whether Kelly and Keith are delivering the news or, more insidiously, BRAINWASHING AMERICA. And rather than yet another appeal for Coca-Cola, people have been reminded of the insanity of Ronald Reagan's "Star Wars" defense system. The South Venice Billboard Correction Committee (SVBCC) has taken its political commentary to the streets - literally. Artistic guerrillas sharing a radical critique of modern society, SVBCC members seize control of selected local billboards by transforming commercial messages into trenchant social criticism. In the process, they join and perpetuate an ancient visual tradition that demands that art should be relevant to human political conflicts. "Billboard correction" is a contemporary if less elegant descendant of Francisco Goya's savage assault on war, Honore Daumier's scathing attack on French monarchy, George Grosz's bitter condemnation of German militarists and industrialists, and the social critiques of hundreds of other visual artists throughout the ages. More directly, billboard correction is rooted in the impressive tradition of public art represented most spectacularly by the monumental Mexican murals of Diego Rivera, José Clemente Orozco, and Davíd Alfaro Siqueiros, from the 1920s to the early 1970s. These efforts and more recent murals in the U.S., Nicaragua, and elsewhere have encouraged billboard correction artists to communicate their critical messages to a wider public transcending the audience and content limitations of official culture. The guerrilla art in Venice, moreover, has obvious and close connections to other modern forms of visual expression. Virtually all societies spawn graffiti. Some are overt protests against various forms of oppression and injustice; others identify youth gangs, delineate territory, and express personal sentiments about love and life. Although the form itself is typically crude, many examples combine creative imagery with socially critical comments. Billboard correction borrows heavily from this later strain of modern graffiti.
The artist-activists of the South Venice Billboard Correction Committee share a similar commitment to providing information and promoting social change. They call vivid attention to the political content and implications of the modern commercial billboard. Their guerrilla alterations identify billboards as outlets for the dissemination of values promoting and reinforcing sexism, militarism, and uncritical consumption. Because billboards are so ubiquitous, their deeper significance often goes unnoticed by a population inundated with commercial propaganda. In newspapers, on radio and television, and even in movie theaters and elsewhere, people are assaulted with solicitations to consume. Advertising transcends a mere appeal for specific products. It matters little whether audiences respond specifically to messages urging them to buy Marlboros or Winstons, Plymouths or Fords, Dan Rather or Peter Jennings. As Herbert Marcuse noted more than 20 years ago, "free" choice of a wide variety of goods and services promotes alienation if no qualitative alternatives are presented and available. Billboard "art" is the epitome of capitalist realism, a visual medium that uses women's bodies to promote consumption, that glorifies substance abuse, and that deflects public attention from glaring social and economic inequities. Billboard correction alters these repressive tendencies by transforming them into messages of progressive and critical thought. The guerrilla approach is far more effective than merely purchasing billboard space for disseminating counter messages. Such a counter message, regardless of content, would be just another billboard, scarcely noticed and ironically destined to reinforce the perceived legitimacy of the genre itself. A deliberately altered commercial billboard, on the other hand, has a visual impact that engages viewers immediately. Vandalism gets attention. A message critical of American imperialism in Central America, for example, has a much higher chance of being noticed when it is superimposed on a tobacco ad. And this impact, finally, is the ultimate rationale for this new twist in political art.
The planning and implementation of billboard correction parallels the process of mural painting - save for one important difference. Unlike community muralists, who paint their social and political messages openly on interior and exterior walls, SVBCC activists are engaged in law breaking and strive to avoid detection by police. The clandestine character of the enterprise contributes to group solidarity and fosters the process of collective artistic endeavor.
Specific plans quickly follow. The initial step is to scout the billboards in a target area. Several questions must be raised and answered: How accessible are they? How high? (Excessive height imposes a variety of technical obstacles and increases time expenditures, thus increasing the possibility of police detection.) How much physical alteration is necessary? (The optimum is to use as much as possible of the billboard itself; this also saves time and decreases the chances of being caught.) Which SVBCC members should perform which tasks efficiently and expeditiously as possible? Is there time for one or perhaps two alterations during the evening? The collective process typically continues when "scouts" return from the streets for more detailed planning. A major objective involves a sustained discussion of the political content. Should they focus on Central America? On Ronald Reagan's reactionary domestic policies? On feminist concerns? On the health hazards of cigarettes? On the political implications of dominant communications in the United States? What specific angle should be emphasized once the topic is selected? When consensus on content is reached, discussion shifts to technique. These visual guerrillas try as much as possible to use existing pictorial and verbal elements on the billboard itself. The problem becomes what should be kept and what should be altered. Different designs are suggested and once again the group makes a collective decision. Specific tasks are assigned to the evening's participants. Some will paint, others will paste, still others will serve as lookouts.
Other corrections involved a combination of pre-painted political message strips with a modest amount of repainting on the billboard itself. In one effort, SVBCC members swiftly changed an advertisement for Vons Supermarket into a highly visible protest against the Nicaraguan contra forces. The letter "V" was transformed into the letter "R" and the "O" was filled in with a skeletal death head, symbolizing the murderous activities of the contras and of the Reagan policy of support for them. The pre-painted strip with the words CONTRA TERRORISM: MADE IN THE USA completes the work. Others require more complex versions of the same technique, CONTRAFIBBERS required extensive repainting in order to match the image of Ronald Reagan as well as paste on the pre-painted message DRIVING TO DESTRUCTION (above). The effect is a powerful and appropriately unsubtle attack on Nicaraguan terrorists and their chief U.S. ally in the White House. Some billboard corrections involve more sophisticated visual guerrilla strategies. STAR WARS (above) required changing a Coke can into a missile and the addition of accompanying captions. In addition, the slogan "Catch the Wave" had to be deleted. The billboard confronts passing drivers and pedestrians with a savage critique of Reagan's grotesque Star Wars defense plan. The alteration of a Winston cigarettes ad involved a similar technique. There, the Winston smoker was transformed into a contra terrorist, replete with helmet, machine gun, and MADE IN THE USA insignia. The cigarette package was similarly altered to look like a missile package with a $100 million price tag for U.S. taxpayers. Finally, a small but significant change at the bottom of the billboard gives new meaning to the familiar Surgeon General's warning: Quitting Terrorism Now Greatly Reduces Serious Health Risks.
In the event of danger, billboard artists jump off if the structure is low enough. When the height is too great painters and pasters are instructed to freeze, thus minimizing suspicious movement. So far, these security procedures have been effective, for no SVBCC projects to date have been detected in process though there have been some close calls. The final step in billboard correction is to document the results. Photographs are made and distributed to participants and sympathizers to provide durable records of radical cultural agitation and encourage similar activity elsewhere.
To be sure, billboard correction is very different from the classic civil disobedience of the civil rights and anti-war movements of the 1960s and 1970s. Unlike sit-in demonstrators who actively sought arrest and willingly accepted the consequences of their violations of the law, billboard correction artists, while obviously non-violent, try to avoid detection and conduct their work under cover of darkness. Billboard correction is deliberate political dissent in visual form. It causes modest damage to dominant social and economic institutions, while conveying oppositional messages regularly ignored or suppressed in the mass media. That rationale would scarcely be persuasive in most U.S. courtrooms. Conversations with Los Angeles area prosecutors and defense attorneys suggest that if caught, SVBCC activists would likely be charged with violating Section 594 of the California Penal Code, a malicious mischief and vandalism statue common throughout most U.S. jurisdictions. Many conclude that it is worth the risk. In Australia, BUGA UP has altered thousands of billboards while sustaining minimal legal damage. Only a handful of the artistic activists in Sydney have been charged with and convicted of willful defacement, the equivalent of California's Section 594. The deeper concern lies in the moral and political propriety involved in conscious law violation. SVBCC activists and their counterparts elsewhere, are far from cavalier. They perceive the harm of lawbreaking as considerably less than that of the sexism, militarism, and public passivity presently polluting the U.S. political landscape. They find that visual attack on repressive social forces and institutions is one of the few options available to political dissenters. They view their work as a modest counter to powerful governmental and corporate voices that sustain and perpetuate injustice. On balance, they find a moral and political justification for their comparatively trivial unlawful acts. Activists elsewhere are apt to concur. Eager to combine visual technique with critical content, billboard correction activists stand to make an impact on community life through the final years of the century. In the process, they will complement their colleagues in other fields as part of a broad movement for political change. The U.S. will be the better for it. |
Back to top |
CDC Home | Mission | Works | Security | Legal | Media | Interview | Links | Contact CDC |